<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andrew Stevens &#187; accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewjstevens.com/tag/accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewjstevens.com</link>
	<description>Technology, media, architecture &#38; strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:48:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do you think you can ignore web accessibility?</title>
		<link>http://andrewjstevens.com/2008/11/do-you-think-you-can-ignore-web-accessibility/</link>
		<comments>http://andrewjstevens.com/2008/11/do-you-think-you-can-ignore-web-accessibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WCAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewjstevens.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am feeling really frustrated today. I have been interacting with some organisations here in Queensland that feel that feel that web accessibility does not apply to them. Can I point out that: Under section 67(1)(k) of the Disability Discrimination Act, the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (Hreoc) issues guidelines for the purpose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am feeling really frustrated today.</p>
<p>I have been interacting with some organisations here in Queensland that feel that feel that web accessibility does not apply to them.</p>
<p>Can I point out that:</p>
<blockquote><p>Under section 67(1)(k) of the Disability Discrimination Act, the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (Hreoc) issues guidelines for the purpose of avoiding discrimination in this area.</p></blockquote>
<p>- <a href="http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=205042451" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=205042451&amp;referer=');">Computerworld</a></p>
<p>The W3C WCAG checkpoints are the measure of compliance.</p>
<p>Sure for private organisations there is &#8220;unjustifiable hardship&#8221; but for government sites this does not apply.</p>
<p>I wrote a position piece on this topic back in 2003 or 2004 maybe. I will dig it up and post it up here &#8211; I wonder if my comments in that paper still stand today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andrewjstevens.com/2008/11/do-you-think-you-can-ignore-web-accessibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
